View of the beachfront, Lake Michigan and the silhouette of buildings in Downtown Chicago. sanctuary city

Is Chicago Still a Sanctuary City?

Chicago has long been recognized as a sanctuary city, a designation that reflects its commitment to protecting undocumented immigrants by limiting local cooperation with federal immigration enforcement. This policy aims to foster trust between immigrant communities and local authorities, encouraging residents to report crimes and engage with public services without fear of deportation. However, recent legal challenges and federal actions have put Chicago’s sanctuary status under intense scrutiny.

View of the beachfront, Lake Michigan and the silhouette of buildings in Downtown Chicago. sanctuary city

Federal Lawsuit Against Chicago’s Sanctuary Policies

In early February 2025, the Trump administration escalated its efforts against sanctuary jurisdictions by filing a lawsuit against the state of Illinois, Cook County, and the city of Chicago. The lawsuit contends that local laws, such as Chicago’s Welcoming City Ordinance and Illinois’s TRUST Act, obstruct federal immigration enforcement by restricting local authorities from collaborating with agencies like Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Specifically, these laws prevent local law enforcement from detaining individuals based solely on immigration status and from sharing pertinent information with federal officials. The Department of Justice argues that such policies “deliberately impede federal immigration officers’ ability to carry out their responsibilities.”

Attorney General Pam Bondi, on her first day in office, directed the Department of Justice to identify and take action against local governments with policies that hinder federal immigration enforcement. This lawsuit against Chicago and Illinois represents a significant move in the administration’s broader strategy to challenge and dismantle sanctuary policies nationwide.

Chicago’s Response and Commitment to Sanctuary Status

Despite federal pressure, Chicago’s leadership remains steadfast in upholding the city’s sanctuary status. Mayor Brandon Johnson has consistently reaffirmed Chicago’s commitment to remaining a welcoming city for all residents, regardless of immigration status. In response to the lawsuit, Mayor Johnson stated that the city’s policies are designed to protect its residents and maintain public safety by ensuring that all individuals feel secure in reporting crimes and accessing essential services.

The Chicago City Council has also demonstrated strong support for maintaining sanctuary protections. In January 2025, efforts by some council members to amend the Welcoming City Ordinance were blocked, reflecting a clear consensus to preserve the city’s protective stance toward undocumented immigrants.

Federal Actions Intensify Against Sanctuary Cities

Chicago’s legal battle is part of a larger national debate over immigration and the role of local governments in federal enforcement. Several states, driven by Republican lawmakers, have introduced measures to penalize local officials who resist cooperation with federal immigration authorities. For instance, Georgia’s recent legislation allows lawsuits against individuals implementing sanctuary policies, while states like Florida and Tennessee have enacted laws imposing fines and felony charges for non-compliance. Proponents argue that these measures are necessary to ensure adherence to federal laws, while critics contend they instill fear within immigrant communities and undermine public safety.

Attorney General Bondi has issued stern warnings to Democratic governors, emphasizing that non-compliance with federal immigration laws will result in significant consequences. 

Community Advocacy and Support for Immigrant Populations

Amidst these challenges, community organizations and advocates in Chicago continue to support immigrant populations. Faith-based leaders, such as Rev. Deborah Lee of the Interfaith Movement for Human Integrity, have been vocal in opposing federal deportation policies and defending sanctuary protections. These advocates emphasize the moral imperative to support immigrants and resist policies they view as unjust.

A diverse coalition of immigrant rights advocates recently gathered at Chicago City Hall to defend the city’s sanctuary status. Their efforts highlight the community’s commitment to protecting vulnerable populations and ensuring that Chicago remains a place of refuge and opportunity for all its residents.

As of February 2025, Chicago maintains its sanctuary city status, steadfastly upholding policies designed to protect undocumented immigrants and foster community trust. The ongoing legal challenges and federal pressures underscore the complex and contentious nature of immigration policy in the United States. Chicago’s resolve in the face of these challenges reflects a broader commitment to human rights and the belief that inclusive policies ultimately contribute to the safety and well-being of the entire community.

How the Lawsuit Could Impact Current Immigrants in Chicago

The lawsuit against Chicago’s sanctuary city policies could have significant consequences for immigrants living in the city. While the lawsuit primarily challenges local government policies, its effects may be felt by undocumented individuals and immigrant communities in several ways.

Increased Fear and Distrust of Law Enforcement

If the lawsuit leads to changes in Chicago’s sanctuary policies, immigrants may feel less safe interacting with local authorities. Many undocumented individuals rely on the assurance that reporting crimes or seeking medical care will not lead to immigration consequences. If Chicago is forced to comply with federal immigration enforcement demands, some immigrants may hesitate to report crimes, access public services, or cooperate with law enforcement due to fear of deportation.

Potential for Increased Immigration Enforcement

If federal authorities gain more access to information about undocumented immigrants through local law enforcement, there could be an increase in targeted enforcement actions, such as arrests and deportations. Even immigrants who have lived in Chicago for years and have no criminal records may face a heightened risk of being detained if federal agencies gain broader authority to act within the city.

Impact on Public Services and Community Programs

Chicago offers various services to immigrants, including legal aid, healthcare, and housing assistance. If the federal government withholds funding or pressures the city to change its sanctuary status, some of these programs could face cuts or restrictions. This could make it more difficult for immigrants—documented or undocumented—to access essential resources.

Legal Challenges and Uncertainty

Ongoing legal battles create uncertainty for immigrants in Chicago. While the city has vowed to defend its sanctuary status, a ruling against it could force officials to reconsider their policies. Immigrants who currently feel protected under Chicago’s laws may have to navigate shifting legal landscapes and seek alternative means of protection.

Community and Advocacy Response

Despite these potential impacts, immigrant advocacy groups and community leaders continue to fight for protections. Organizations that provide legal support and emergency assistance may play an increasingly important role in helping immigrants understand their rights and options if federal enforcement expands.

Overall, while Chicago’s leadership remains committed to its sanctuary policies, the lawsuit introduces a level of uncertainty that could affect thousands of immigrants who call the city home.

Learn more about how Chicago’s city ordinance provides a safety zone for immigrants, and how our immigration attorneys can help your family. Call Khalaf & Abuzir, LLC at (708) 233-1122.

Vivian R. Khalaf is a founding partner of Khalaf & Abuzir, LLC, and its affiliate office in Ramallah, Palestine, “Agility Services”. Ms. Khalaf practices family-based immigration and business immigration. She is also experienced in family law matters, with an emphasis on Islamic matrimonial issues.

Years of Experience: More than 20 years
Illinois Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions:
Illinois State Bar Association
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois